Portrait of Maugham by Edouard MacAvoy.
As the editors of Wikipedia
insist on blindly following “reliable sources”, even when these are clearly
wrong or at best of questionable quality (or, indeed, misinterpreted), I
provide here a compendium of the inaccuracies and the omissions in their List of works by W. Somerset Maugham. I suggest readers who are seriously – I
repeat: seriously – interested in
Maugham have a look at this post before they trust Wikipedia.
Three works listed as “short
story collection” – “Judgment Seat”, “Princess September and the Nightingale”
and “The Unconquered” – are in fact single short stories reprinted in pamphlet
form. All of them can be found in Maugham’s other books, including all editions
of Complete/Collected Short Stories.
For more information, see this Bibliography
and use Ctrl+F.
Quartet (1948), Trio (1951) and Encore (1952) shouldn’t be on this list, either. They don’t contain
enough original material. All short stories are reprints from Maugham’s
collections. Of the ten screenplays he may have written only one (“The Verger”).
His introductions to the stories themselves are original, but they amount to no
more than a few paragraphs.
The entry for The Book Bag (1932) requires special
attention, for it is badly messed up. The short story collection published by
Ray Long and Richard R. Smith contained 20 short stories all right, but only
one of them was by Maugham, “The Book Bag”. This was its first appearance in
any form. Note 27, however, leads you to the Library of Congress record about the
separate publication of the story by G. Orioli, Florence , some three months later. For more
information, see Stott A43. Both works should
have been relegated to footnotes.
Stott is an indispensable
resource for readers and collectors of Maugham. But he is full of errors, some
of them pretty embarrassing, and many of his decisions what to include and
where are, to say the least, questionable. To follow him slavishly, without
exercising any critical thinking at all, is simply stupid. For more
details about errors in his Section A, see here.
For a critical examination of his unsatisfactory treatment of Maugham’s
all-important prefaces, see here.
This section gives only
original titles. It omits all alternative and much better known titles. What is
the point of listing so many titles that nobody but a few passionate collectors
of old magazines are familiar with – this I don’t profess to know. Nor is there
any information about the nature of the piece (short story, essay, serialisation
of play or novel) or whether it was collected later in book form. For a
comprehensive overview on these “not really encyclopaedic” matters, see this Bibliography
and use Ctrl+F. For an update of Stott’s highly dated Section D, from which the
Wikipedia list was copied, see here.
Only Wiki’s most blatant errors and omissions are listed below.
“Schiffbrüchig” was published
in The Venture for 1903 under its
English title Marriages are Made in
Heaven (Stott D4).
Four pieces – “Pygmalion at
Home and Abroad” (1914), “Maltreat the Dead in Fiction" (1930), “Maugham
Discusses Drama” (1931) and “Mr Tomkin's [sic] Sitter” (1941) – were not
written by Maugham at all. The first two are reviews, the last two are
interviews. Stott wrongly lists all of them in Section D, but they all belong
to Section G. See The Collection of Norman Moore, Section D.
“The Professional Writer” was
published on 29 January 1938, not 1939. It is an extract from The Summing Up.
“Britain Views the French Navy”
(July 1940) was actually published under the title “A Briton Views the French Navy”.
This list is a
mess. In addition to nearly all important collected editions, it also lists a
number of random collections with short stories that have no business here
(e.g. “Here and There”, “The Sinners”, “Husbands and Wives”, among others).
Following the same logic, the list with Maugham’s “collected editions” would
swell to enormous proportions. For a much more concise and precise treatment of
the subject, see Section F in this Bibliography.
Wisdom
of Life: An Anthology of Noble Thoughts, London :
Watts , 1938, was not edited by Maugham. J. F.
Green was the sole editor. This was merely a “New edition, with additions by W.
Somerset Maugham and Others” (Stott C22).
Maugham didn’t edit The House with the Green Shutters by
George Douglas, either. He merely wrote a preface to it (Stott C23). If
contributing in this way is considered editorial work, then this list must
include Stott’s complete Section C (63 entries).
The
Noble Spaniard is not a play by Maugham. It’s an adaptation of a play by
Grenet-Dancourt. Stott incorrectly includes it as A75.
Mademoiselle
Zampa is not unpublished. It can be found in A Traveller in Romance (1984), ed. John Whitehead. It first appeared in The Sketch (6 December, 1905) under the title A Rehearsal.
The
Summing Up is not, of course, an “autobiography”. France at War does, indeed, deal with “current affairs”, but it’s
more accurately described as propaganda. Sources? Just read the books!
Don
Fernando (1935) was considerably revised for the 1950 reprint in The Collected Edition. See Stott A49 for
details.
Ten
Novels and Their Authors (1954) is a little more than “the UK edition” of Great Novelists and Their Novels (1948). The book was expanded and
revised for the 1954 edition. The first American edition of this version
appeared in 1955 under the title The Art
of Fiction. Stott A69 and B24.
The
Writer’s Point of View is not “essays”. It is a single essay, the Ninth
Annual Lecture of National Book League given by Maugham in Kingsway Hall on
24.10.1951. Stott A72.
The list omits Purely for My Pleasure (1962), Maugham’s
last book published during his lifetime. Stott A78.
For more information, see
Sections A. 4. and D in this Bibliography.
No comments:
Post a Comment